Project Risk Framework
Risk Category | Potential Risk Areas | What would constitute a "low risk" (e.g. score 1) | What would constitute a "very high risk" (e.g. score 5) | Score by category (1-5) |
---|---|---|---|---|
Project governance | Clear and effective | Unclear and ineffective | ||
Local government | No involvement/passive | Active/Obstructive | ||
Reputational Issues | Standard build | High profile development | ||
Schedule | Realistic | Aggressive/Unrealistic | ||
Raw Material Supply | Secured and predictable pricing | Uncertain and price volatility | ||
Local Wage Inflation | Low and static | High and volatile | ||
Stakeholder involvement | Non/passive | Active/Obstructive | ||
Demographics of the neighbourhood | Broad, with weak cultural influences | Concentrated, strong cultural influences | ||
Access by road/rail | Easy accessibility | Difficult to access site | ||
Project complexity | Simple | Complex | ||
Project requirements and scope definition | Well Defined | Poorly Defined | ||
Technology | Standard | New/Unproven | ||
3rd party permissions required | Minimal | Major Effort with Unclear Requirements | ||
Industrial Relations | Good | Militant Trade Unions | ||
Loan finance availability for buyers | Low interest rates, credit availability | High interest rates, credit tight | ||
Project location | Well known | Unknown, first presence | ||
Environment/Climate | Moderate | Harsh | ||
Environmental regulation | Easy to understand and comply | Complex and restrictive | ||